Organizational Culture and Change Management, Are Sri Lankan Organizations Truly Transforming or Simply Rebranding?
With the affected economic crisis
that Sri Lanka has experienced over the last several years and pressure to then
restructure organizational functions, the notion of culture change has become
an essential strategic need. Companies in all sectors are making investments in
change management programs, transformational programs and cultural rebranding
programs. But a basic question remains,
Are organizations in Sri Lanka
really changing their cultural fabric or are they simply rebranding their
current behaviors in the name of change?
Fig. 1: Schein Three Levels of Organizational Culture
Source: Adapted to (Schein, 1985)
The organizational culture model by
Schein is a model that is invaluable in the depth and complexity of
organizational culture. As figure 1 clearly illustrates, the framework illustrates
that culture is functioning at three distinct levels which are interconnected,
artefacts, espoused values and underlying assumptions. Although artefacts which
include dress codes, office layouts, formal rituals. The most significant and
long standing determinant of organizational behavior underlying assumptions,
the unconscious assumptions that shape the way employees think, feel and act. Importantly,
most of the change management projects in Sri lanka deal only with the artefact
level and the underlying assumptions are not challenged at all. A organization
can redo it office design and update its mission statement as long as the hierarchical
deference and fear of authority still dominate its real decision making culture.
This difference is especially
decisive in Sri Lanka, where such cultural dimensions as high power distance
and collectivism, as (Hofstede, 2001) emphasizes, the theory play a crucial
role in the workplace. Viewable restructuring programs have been implemented by
firms like Sri Lanka Telecom and state owned institutions, but studies have
indicated that deep-rooted assumptions about seniority and power have remained
largely unchanged underneath these veneer programs (Chandrakumara and Sparrow,
2004). Cultural change requires interventions that reach all three levels of
the Schein model, a much more complex and long lasting task than most
organizations appreciate.
Figure 2: 8 Step Change Model as developed by Kotter
Source: Adapted version of (Kotter, 1996)
Figure 2 depicts a diagram that emphasizes
a systematic approach to overcome this complexity based on the Kotter’s 8 step change
model. The model focusses on the idea that sustainable change involves gradual,
conscious stages, the first one being the creation of urgency, and the last one
being the establishment of new behaviors into organizational systems. Importantly
the framework contends that firms that proclaim success too soon often revert
to previous cultural standards. The trend is sharp in the Sri Lankan context
where change momentum needs to fade away unless there are well developed initialization
processes like a culturally sensitive performance management systems,
leadership development initiatives and strengthening reward systems.
Encouraging examples, however, are
more in the private sector. Sustainability and inclusion have been
strategically implemented across the performance management and leadership
pipeline at MAS Holdings, which is a clear indication of a conscious effort to
ensure that cultural values are anchored beyond the artefact level (MAS
Holdings, 2024). Likewise, Hemas Holdings has institutionalized values of
innovation based on organized talent development processes, which show a more
integrated involvement of cultural transformation.
CONCLUSION
Organizational culture is no longer
a communication game, it is a system of assumptions deeply ingrained in the
organization, which cannot be superficially changed. To attain real change as
opposed to cosmetic rebranding, the HR leaders of Sri Lankan organizations need
to address all three levels of Schein cultural model and apply structured
change models like the 8 Step model of Kotter. Sustainable cultural
transformation can only be realised through anchoring new values into all HR
systems, including recruitment and leadership development.
Chandrakumara, A. and Sparrow, P.
(2004) 'Work orientation as an element of national culture and its impact on
HRM policy-practice design choices', International Journal of Manpower,
25(6), pp. 564–589. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1108/01437720410560451(Accessed: 19 April 2026).
Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture's
Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations
Across Nations. 2nd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Kotter, J.P. (1996) Leading
Change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
MAS Holdings (2024) Sustainability
Report 2023. Available at: https://masholdings.com/our-impact-reports/
(Accessed: 19 April 2026).
Schein, E.H. (1985) Organizational
Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Sri Lanka Telecom PLC (2023) Annual
Report 2022. Colombo: Sri Lanka Telecom. Available at:
https://www.slt.lk/en/about-us/investors/financial-reports/annual (Accessed: 19
April 2026).
This blog clearly highlights an important issue in Sri Lankan organizations. The gap between visible change and real cultural transformation. Many companies seem to focus on surface level changes like policies or branding, but as explained through Schein’s model, true change must address underlying assumptions. The examples given also show that sustainable transformation is possible when organizations align their systems and leadership with cultural values. Do you think Sri Lankan organizations are ready to challenge deep-rooted power distance and move towards more open and adaptive cultures?
ReplyDeleteMany organizations focus on visible changes like policies or branding, but true transformation requires addressing the deeper cultural assumptions, as Schein’s model explains. Challenging power distance is not easy in Sri Lanka, given traditional hierarchies, but there are encouraging signs. Younger generations, exposure to global practices, and the rise of more participative leadership styles are gradually pushing organizations toward openness and adaptability. While the shift may be slow, those companies willing to align leadership behavior and systems with cultural values will be better positioned to build sustainable, engaged workplaces.
DeleteYour article presents a clear and well-structured explanation of how organizational culture and change are closely interconnected. I especially liked how you highlighted that culture is not just about values, but also about behaviors and daily practices that influence how employees respond to change. This aligns well with the idea that culture shapes how people think, act, and adapt within an organization .
ReplyDeleteYou also did a great job explaining the challenges of change, particularly resistance from employees, which is a common issue when organizations try to shift long-standing norms. Research also shows that without proper alignment between culture and change strategies, organizations struggle to sustain transformation .
How can leaders practically measure whether a cultural change initiative is truly successful beyond just short-term performance improvements?
Leaders can assess cultural change by looking beyond short term results and focusing on behavioral shifts such as increased collaboration, openness, and adaptability. Tools like engagement surveys and feedback systems help track whether values are reflected in daily practices. Most importantly, if these behaviors continue consistently over time without constant supervision, it indicates the cultural change has truly been embedded.
DeleteThis is a clear and insightful blog that effectively uses Schein's Three Levels of Organizational Culture to show that many Sri Lankan organizations focus only on surface-level changes while ignoring deep-rooted assumptions.
ReplyDeleteYour application of Kotter's 8-Step Change Model is also strong, especially in highlighting why change efforts fail when they are not sustained or embedded into systems.
Examples like MAS Holdings and Hemas Holdings support your argument well by showing that real transformation comes from integrating culture into leadership and HR practices.
Overall, the key point is clear: Sri Lankan organizations must move beyond rebranding and focus on deep, system-level cultural change to achieve lasting results.
Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. I am glad the use of Edgar Schein’s model and John Kotter’s framework resonated. As you highlighted, real transformation goes beyond surface level changes, organizations need to embed culture into leadership, systems, and everyday practices. The examples of MAS Holdings reinforce that lasting change comes from aligning deep assumptions with organizational processes, not just rebranding.
DeleteYour post is a very thoughtful analysis that clearly highlights the gap between surface-level change initiatives and true cultural transformation in Sri Lankan organizations. The use of Schein’s model effectively shows why many change programs often fail to go beyond visible artefacts. I also agree that without addressing underlying assumptions, most efforts risk becoming rebranding rather than real transformation.
ReplyDeleteWhat is your view on how can HR leaders practically influence deeply rooted cultural assumptions in organizations where hierarchy and power distance are strongly embedded?
You are right Nadun, Schein’s model shows that true change requires addressing underlying assumptions, not just surface artefacts. For HR leaders to influence deeply rooted cultural norms like hierarchy and power distance, practical steps include modeling inclusive leadership behaviors, creating safe spaces for open dialogue, and gradually embedding participative practices into performance management and team structures. Small but consistent actions such as encouraging feedback, recognizing contributions across levels, and promoting transparency can slowly shift assumptions over time. While change may be gradual, HR leaders who align systems and leadership practices with values of openness and adaptability can begin to reshape even deeply embedded cultural patterns.
DeleteYour blog on organizational culture and change is very good and easy to understand. I like how you explained how culture affects people and how change is important in organizations.
ReplyDeleteBut I want to raise a question. When organizations try to change their culture, do you think employees always accept it easily, or do they face resistance because of habits and fear of change?
I agree with you, employees don’t always accept cultural change easily. Resistance is common because habits, routines, and comfort zones create a sense of stability. Fear of the unknown, concerns about job security, and doubts about adapting to new expectations often fuel this resistance. As Kotter and other change theorists explain, it’s a natural human response rather than outright opposition. The key for organizations is to manage this transition with clear communication, emotional support, and genuine employee involvement. When people understand the purpose of change and feel included in shaping it, resistance gradually shifts into acceptance and even commitment.
Delete